- From: Stephen Buxton <Stephen.Buxton@oracle.com>
- Date: 16 Feb 04 14:26:07
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
SECTION 6.2.2: Accessors (in 6.2 Element nodes) dm:string-value(): the note about "recovering" the original lexical representation of xs:dateTime, xs:date and xs:time types hints that the model is that the original lexical representation can be lost (probably as a result of forming the PSVI). If that is the case, then don't we need to talk about some other types as well? For example, xs:duration. There are many equivalent ways to represent a zero duration, such as P0Y = P0M = P0D = PT0H = PT0M = PT0S. Given an element of simple type xs:duration whose value is the zero duration, which of these (or many other candidates) is the string value? In general many types have more than one lexical representation for the same value. Since the model is that the implementaiton is not required to save the true original lexical representation, we need rules telling which lexical representation to regenerate as the string value. - Steve B.
Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 17:26:11 UTC