- From: Stephen Buxton <Stephen.Buxton@oracle.com>
- Date: 16 Feb 04 13:08:13
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
SECTION 3.7.1: direct element constructors
Consider the following example:
<a>{attribute b {1}}</a>
Question: is this acceptable syntax, or is it an error because
the }} is interpreted as a literal for right curly brace?
If it is not acceptable, then it would be helpful to say that
if the user has an expression requiring two successive }s, then the
user should put whitespace between them. If it is acceptable,
then you should qualify that }} is interpreted as a literal for
a right curly brace unless used in a context where two successive
right curly braces would be acceptable.
According to the tables in A.2.2, }} is only recognized in state
ELEMENT_CONTENT. I simuled the rules in these tables on the
example above and found that it is in state OPERATOR when the }}
is encountered. The OPERATOR state recognizes } but not }}.
My tentative conclusion is that the example is valid and }} can be used to close two expressions, and not always as a literal for right curly brace.
This appears to be the user-friendly answer, but I worry that
users will find it hard to know when }} is a literal for a
right curly brace and when it is two closing curly braces.
One solution would be to do away with }} as a literal for
curly brace. Instead, you might define a character reference.
- Steve B.
Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 16:08:16 UTC