- From: Stephen Buxton <Stephen.Buxton@oracle.com>
- Date: 16 Feb 04 11:57:01
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
SECTION 3.1.1 : literals There is no description, here or in Appendix A.1, of what is or is not a valid CharRef, merely that it is "an XML-style reference to a Unicode character, identified by its decimal or hexadecimal code point." The use of "XML-style" is unnecessarily vague. The answer is that it depends on whether the implementation is using XML 1.0 or XML 1.1 lexical rules. In either case, it is given by the Well-formedness Constraint: Legal Character" in section 4.1 of either [XML 1.0] or [XML 1.1]. This rule should be cited here. Otherwise it would appear that � conforms to the EBNF for CharRef, and it should not. - Steve B.
Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 14:57:03 UTC