- From: Stephen Buxton <Stephen.Buxton@oracle.com>
- Date: 16 Feb 04 11:46:42
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
SECTION 2.6.5: pragmas Rules [1] "Pragma" and [5] "PragmaContents" are ambiguous because they do not exclude the possibility of "::)" being among the PragmaContents* . See the way XML 1.0 rule [15] defines "Comment". Actually, that rule prohibits "--" from being in the body of a Comment, and not merely "-->", perhaps so that you only need one character lookahead to decide if the comment is coming to an end. You may want to have a similar rule excluding "::" from the body of a Pragma (or excluding "::)" if you are willing to tolerate two-character look-ahead). Similar remarks apply to rule [2], "MUExtension". As for Rules [3] "ExprComment" and [4] "ExprCommentContent", you want to exclude ":)" from ExprCommentContent. - Steve B.
Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 14:46:45 UTC