- From: Stephen Buxton <Stephen.Buxton@oracle.com>
- Date: 16 Feb 04 11:21:32
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
SECTION 2.1.1: static context In-scope collations: it says that a collation "may be regarded...". Unlike F&O, there is no definition of "may". The F&O definition ("Conforming documents and processors are permitted to, but need not, behave as described") does not seem appropriate here. Is an implementation permitted, but not required, to "regard" a collation as an object with two functions? I don't think an implementation can "regard" anything, since "regarding" is a mental act (though implementers, their product literature and their users might have such a mental model). - Steve B.
Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 14:21:37 UTC