- From: Stephen Buxton <Stephen.Buxton@oracle.com>
- Date: 16 Feb 04 11:21:32
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
SECTION 2.1.1: static context
In-scope collations: it says that a collation "may be regarded...".
Unlike F&O, there is no definition of "may". The F&O
definition ("Conforming documents and processors are permitted to,
but need not, behave as described") does not seem appropriate here.
Is an implementation permitted, but
not required, to "regard" a collation as an object with two
functions? I don't think an implementation can "regard" anything,
since "regarding" is a mental act (though implementers, their
product literature and their users might have such a mental model).
- Steve B.
Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 14:21:37 UTC