RE: [XQuery] MS-XQ-LC1-108 from Michael Rys on 2004-02-16 (public-qt-comments@w3.org from February 2004)

From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:12:27 -0800
To: <jwrobie@mindspring.com>
Cc: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EB0A327048144442AFB15FCE18DC96C7020A345F@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

The empty first|last indication on orderby. The order is
implementation-defined, but it would be useful to overwrite the
implementation-defined default by setting it in the static context
instead of only the syntax.

Best regards
Michael

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:jwrobie@mindspring.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 10:06 AM
> To: Michael Rys
> Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [XQuery] MS-XQ-LC1-108
> 
> Hi Michael,
> 
> I don't understand this - could you please explain what you mean by
> "empty sort default" in this message?
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> Michael Rys wrote:
> 
> >Section 3.8.3 Order By and Return Clauses
> >Technical
> >
> >Provide an XQuery prolog statement affecting the static context to
> >define empty sort default.
> >
> >
> >

Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 13:12:17 UTC