- From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 09:58:21 -0800
- To: <jwrobie@mindspring.com>
- Cc: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
But we are not going to change the schemata in our examples. // has a couple of issues, especially in the context of static type inference that makes it not the best choice to formulate many queries and often cannot be optimized better than the path expressions. Best regards Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:jwrobie@mindspring.com] > Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 9:53 AM > To: Michael Rys > Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org > Subject: Re: [XQuery] MS-XQ-LC1-110 > > I disagree. In general, queries using // are more robust to changes in > the schema than queries that spell out the entire path, and are a better > way to write such queries, as long as the underlying implementation > optimizes appropriately. > > Jonathan > > Michael Rys wrote: > > >General Comment > >Examples > > > >We should reduce the amount of examples that use // and instead write > >them with the full path. This is giving a bad example to users in cases > >where a clear path exists. > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 12:58:14 UTC