[XQuery] MS-XQ-LC1-076 from Michael Rys on 2004-02-16 (public-qt-comments@w3.org from February 2004)

From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 03:10:26 -0800
To: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EB0A327048144442AFB15FCE18DC96C7020A31E3@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

Section 3.5.1 Value Comparisons	
Technical	

Do the same casting rule for untypedAtomic value as on general compare.
Having two different casting rules is confusing to the user. More so,
than the potential loss of transitivity (which is lost by implicit casts
anyway due to loss of precision).

Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 06:10:36 UTC