- From: Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:39:27 -0000
- To: "'Daniela Florescu'" <danielaf@bea.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
> > We should simplify the data model and request the name of a type (even > anonymous) to be a legal Qname. > Since there is no way for an application to determine the name of an anonymous type, this would be (a) an unnecessary constraint on implementations, and (b) an untestable assertion. Of course, if your comment requesting that this property be exposed to applications is accepted, then this objection disappears. Michael Kay
Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 05:38:51 UTC