RE: [DM] BEA_005

> 
> We should simplify the data model and request the name of a type (even
> anonymous) to be a legal Qname.
> 

Since there is no way for an application to determine the name of an
anonymous type, this would be (a) an unnecessary constraint on
implementations, and (b) an untestable assertion.

Of course, if your comment requesting that this property be exposed to
applications is accepted, then this objection disappears.

Michael Kay

Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 05:38:51 UTC