- From: Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:14:39 -0800
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language
W3C Working Draft 12 November 2003
Here are some comments from
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2002Jan/0002.html
that did not receive a response from the WG.
--------------------
[3] ExprComment
This seems like a poor name for the symbol, given that it's not a
kind of expression. (In fact, CompXmlComment would seem to have more
of a claim to the name, since it actually is a kind of expression.)
Why not just "Comment"?
By the way, why did you drop single-line comments (# to line-end)?
What is the grammatical/lexical effect of a comment? E.g., is
foo(: comment :)bar
equivalent to
foobar
or
foo bar
?
(And is the effect the same for Pragmas and MUExtensions?)
--------
[9] DoubleLiteral
Change ("e" | "E") to [eE]
Change ("+" | "-") to [+-]
[23] HexDigits
Change
([0-9] | [a-f] | [A-F])
to
[0-9a-fA-F]
--------
3.7.1 Direct Element Constructors
"a pair of identical curly brace characters within the content of an
element or attribute are interpreted by XQuery as a single curly brace
character"
[And similarly in A.2.2 ELEMENT_CONTENT.]
An alternative would be to use character references (e.g., {
and }).
-Michael Dyck
Received on Friday, 13 February 2004 21:16:25 UTC