- From: Anders Berglund <alrb@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:23:35 -0500
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Comment on 2.2.3.2, 4th paragraph, definition of "dynamic type": The "definition" of "dynamic type" is inconsistent with the use of the term elsewhere. It DEFINES it to be "associated with each value as it is computed" in the DYNAMIC PHASE. The term is also used in 2.2.1 where it is stated that "Each atomic value, element node, and attribute node in the data model is annotated with its dynamic type." in the data model. A similar term (is it intended to be the same?) "dynamic (run-time) type" is used in 2.4.2; also referring to type annotations of nodes in the data model. Both these uses have nothing to do with values computed during the dynamic phase. The inconsistency can be solved by removing the first sentence of the definition and adding a sentence or two really defining the term. The removed sentence could be retained outside the definition.
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2004 15:23:41 UTC