- From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 16:40:42 -0800
- To: "Michael Kay" <mhk@mhk.me.uk>, "Jonathan Robie" <jonathan.robie@datadirect.com>, "XML Query Comments" <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Well said, Michael. Best regards Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael Kay > Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 2:49 PM > To: 'Jonathan Robie'; 'XML Query Comments' > Subject: RE: Static flagger belongs in static context > > > > > > "2.6.6.1 XQuery Flagger" says: "If the XQuery Flagger is > > enabled, a static error [err:XQ0015] is raised if the query > > contains a must-understand extension." This implies that the > > XQuery Flagger must be available in the static context. > > > > I personally think the XQuery Flagger is unenforceable and therefore > should be removed. > > We cannot stop someone shipping a product that supports two languages, > one of which is XQuery and the other is NotXQuery. Such a product can > claim conformance. The fact that the language supported by NotXQuery is > actually XQuery plus extensions, with no flagger, cannot alter the fact > that the product as a whole is conformant. The XQuery specification > cannot impose any constraints on the behavior of a NotXQuery processor. > > Michael Kay
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2004 19:40:59 UTC