- From: Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
- Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 10:03:12 -0000
- To: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
This was originally raised at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xsl-wg/2003Nov/0016.html (member-only URL) (Note that is comment is against XSLT match patterns only, it doesn't affect XPath or XQuery) We currently allow the union operator in a pattern to be written either as "|" or as "union". I'm inclined to disallow the "union" synonym. This is because it doesn't work with "/" as one of the operands. Writing / union * gives you a parse error because "union" after "/" is interpreted as a QName. Unlike XPath, we don't have the opportunity to disambiguate it by writing (/) union *, because we don't allow parentheses in a pattern. / union /* is even worse because it doesn't give you a parse error, it just matches the wrong nodes. Adding the synonym doesn't provide any extra functionality or usability and only introduces a potential problem. Michael Kay
Received on Friday, 6 February 2004 05:02:47 UTC