- From: Jan Hidders <jan.hidders@ua.ac.be>
- Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 15:52:13 +0100
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
L.S., Can the implementation of a computed elemement constructor freely choose the order of the attribute nodes? For example, is the result of element { "a" } { attribute { "b" } { "" }, attribute { "c" } { "" } } always <a b="" c=""/> or can it also be <a c="" b=""/> ? I would expect the latter for fundamental (attributes are essentially unordered) and practical reasons (letting the implementation choose a certain ordering my sometimes make certain operations more efficient), but It's not clear to me what the informal and formal semantics exactly have to say about this. I already raised a related point before (the document order of the contents of an element created with a computed element constructor seems underspecified) but am not sure about the follow-up, so if this has already been discussed I apologize. -- Jan Hidders -- .-----------.-----------------------------------------------------. / Jan Hidders \ Home Page: http://www.win.ua.ac.be/~hidders/ \ .---------------.-----------------------------------------------------. | Post-doctoral researcher e-mail: jan.hidders@ua.ac.be | | Dept. Math. & Computer Science tel: (+32) 3 265 38 73 | | University of Antwerp fax: (+32) 3 265 37 77 | | Middelheimlaan 1, BE-2020 Antwerpen, BELGIUM room: G 3.21 | `---------------------------------------------------------------------'
Received on Monday, 2 February 2004 09:53:20 UTC