W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > August 2004

RE: [F&O] line ends in unparsed-text()

From: <David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 08:14:05 +0100
Message-ID: <9B66BBD37D5DD411B8CE00508B69700F06FFE203@pborolocal.rnib.org.uk>
To: davidc@nag.co.uk, public-qt-comments@w3.org


    -----Original Message-----
    From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org 
    [mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael Kay
    unparsed-text() is not actually an F&O function, it is an 
    XSLT-only function.
    I think there's some merit in this suggestion, 

Having already fallen foul of this x-platform difference,
I support aligning this as suggested by David Carisle.
  Almost an editorial change?

regards DaveP.


NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the 
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the 
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it 
and any attachments from your system. 

RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by 
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any  such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. 

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and 
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent 
those of RNIB. 

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk 
Received on Tuesday, 24 August 2004 07:14:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:21 UTC