- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 23:46:56 +0100
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
answering my own question > why can't ForwardStep | ReverseStep be moved into PrimaryExpression so I suppose it's because you want the grammar to not only specify the syntactically legal strings but also impart some semantics and precedence order, ie you want to reflect that not only are ancestor::foo[1] and (ancestor::foo)[1] both legal, but that they mean something different. one being an axis step and t'other a filter expression. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 3 August 2004 18:47:08 UTC