- From: Kay, Michael <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 20:09:31 +0200
- To: Oliver Becker <obecker@informatik.hu-berlin.de>, public-qt-comments@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2003 14:12:22 UTC
> But then, please, don't call it a function if it is not a
> function. (Dimitre, help! ;-) )
It is a function! It returns a permutation of its input.
It's only difference from other functions is in its motivation: it exists in
order to be optimized.
Michael Kay
>
> Could it be a comprise to change the terminology to something
> else ("directive" or whatever) but leave the grammar as it
> is? For example, node() looks like a functions, but it is
> not. The same way unordered(..) would look like a function,
> but it is in
> reality something very different.
>
> Oliver
>
>
> /-------------------------------------------------------------------\
> | ob|do Dipl.Inf. Oliver Becker |
> | --+-- E-Mail: obecker@informatik.hu-berlin.de |
> | op|qo WWW: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~obecker |
> \-------------------------------------------------------------------/
>
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2003 14:12:22 UTC