- From: Kay, Michael <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 20:09:31 +0200
- To: Oliver Becker <obecker@informatik.hu-berlin.de>, public-qt-comments@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2003 14:12:22 UTC
> But then, please, don't call it a function if it is not a > function. (Dimitre, help! ;-) ) It is a function! It returns a permutation of its input. It's only difference from other functions is in its motivation: it exists in order to be optimized. Michael Kay > > Could it be a comprise to change the terminology to something > else ("directive" or whatever) but leave the grammar as it > is? For example, node() looks like a functions, but it is > not. The same way unordered(..) would look like a function, > but it is in > reality something very different. > > Oliver > > > /-------------------------------------------------------------------\ > | ob|do Dipl.Inf. Oliver Becker | > | --+-- E-Mail: obecker@informatik.hu-berlin.de | > | op|qo WWW: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~obecker | > \-------------------------------------------------------------------/ >
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2003 14:12:22 UTC