- From: Oliver Becker <obecker@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 12:46:02 +0200 (MEST)
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> The WGs discussed this on 9/16/2003 and decided not to make the change > recommended because a function provides finer-grained control than a > directive. I'm sorry, but I don't understand what the *function* fn:unordered really ought to do. Consider the also discussed distinct-values example. <xsl:variable name="a" select="distinct-values((1,2,3,2,1,2,3,2,1))" /> <xsl:variable name="b" select="fn:unordered($a)" /> What are the values of $a and $b please? By the way, I just noted the following: shouldn't the example of distinct-values uses the additional pair of parentheses? Instead of fn:distinct-values(1, 2.0, 3, 2) returns something write fn:distinct-values((1, 2.0, 3, 2)) returns something Otherwise it would be a call with 4 parameters. Regards, Oliver Becker /-------------------------------------------------------------------\ | ob|do Dipl.Inf. Oliver Becker | | --+-- E-Mail: obecker@informatik.hu-berlin.de | | op|qo WWW: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~obecker | \-------------------------------------------------------------------/
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:46:04 UTC