RE: MS-FO-LC1-054: 9.2.1.2 on negative years. from Ashok Malhotra on 2003-09-23 (public-qt-comments@w3.org from September 2003)

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 07:26:17 -0700
To: "Michael Rys" <mrys@microsoft.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <E5B814702B65CB4DA51644580E4853FB0ADB3A9E@red-msg-12.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

Thank you for your comment.  This was discussed by the WGs and it was
decided that there was no reason to be gratuitously different from XML
Schema in this regard.

All the best, Ashok

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael Rys
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 7:14 PM
> To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: MS-FO-LC1-054: 9.2.1.2 on negative years.
> 
> 
> Class: Editorial/Technical
> 
> For the same reasons, the F&O spec should also add that minimally
> conforming processors do not have to support negative years either.
>

Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2003 10:26:23 UTC