RE: MS-FO-LC1-087: rename op:node-equal from Ashok Malhotra on 2003-09-21 (public-qt-comments@w3.org from September 2003)

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 16:00:44 -0700
To: "Michael Rys" <mrys@microsoft.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Cc: "Don Chamberlin" <chamberl@almaden.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <E5B814702B65CB4DA51644580E4853FB0AB92D30@red-msg-12.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

The WGs discussed this on 9/18/2003 and decided to rename op:node-equal
to op:is-same-node.

Don, please update the operator mapping table accordingly.

All the best, Ashok

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael Rys
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 1:06 AM
> To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: MS-FO-LC1-087: rename op:node-equal
> 
> 
> Class: Editorial
> 
> Section 14.1.6: op:node-equal should be called op:node-identical to
> avoid value semantics interpretation.
>

Received on Sunday, 21 September 2003 19:00:47 UTC