The WGs discussed this on 9/18/2003 and decided to rename op:node-equal to op:is-same-node. Don, please update the operator mapping table accordingly. All the best, Ashok > -----Original Message----- > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael Rys > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 1:06 AM > To: public-qt-comments@w3.org > Subject: MS-FO-LC1-087: rename op:node-equal > > > Class: Editorial > > Section 14.1.6: op:node-equal should be called op:node-identical to > avoid value semantics interpretation. >Received on Sunday, 21 September 2003 19:00:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:56:49 UTC