W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > September 2003

RE: ORA-FO-DATETIME-SIGNATURES Section 9.7.1, 9.7.2, 9.7.3, 9.7.4

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 11:14:00 -0700
Message-ID: <E5B814702B65CB4DA51644580E4853FB0AB92D07@red-msg-12.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Stephen Buxton" <stephen.buxton@oracle.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
The WGs agreed to make these changes in the meeting on 9/16/2003.  They
will appear in the next version.

All the best, Ashok 

________________________________

From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Buxton
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 7:13 AM
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: ORA-FO-DATETIME-SIGNATURES Section 9.7.1, 9.7.2, 9.7.3, 9.7.4

 

Functions and Operators, Section 9.7.1, 9.7.2, 9.7.3, 9.7.4 

The function signatures need "?" after argument types, since $srcval1,
$srcval2, etc. can be the empty sequence. 
And the return also needs a "?", since "If either argument is the empty
sequence, returns the empty sequence". 

See also
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Jun/0217.html
Received on Sunday, 21 September 2003 14:14:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:56:49 UTC