- From: MURATA Makoto <mmurata@trl.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 15:32:27 +0900
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc: mm <mmurata@trl.ibm.com>
Are the inference rules for static analysis normative or non-normative? In other words, are all implementations of static analysis requierd to follow the static inference rules as specified in the formal semantics spec? Suppose that I construct a static inference engine that takes full advantage of backward axes. That engine would create types narrower than those created by the static inference rules in the formal semantic spec. Is that engine non-conformant? This would be very unforunate. -- MURATA Makoto <mmurata@trl.ibm.com>
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2003 02:32:39 UTC