- From: Kay, Michael <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:31:15 +0200
- To: Jim Melton <jim.melton@acm.org>, Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <DFF2AC9E3583D511A21F0008C7E62106073DD105@daemsg02.software-ag.de>
But it would be nice to get the quote right. From Henry VI Part 2, Jon Bosak edition: <SPEECH> <SPEAKER>CADE</SPEAKER> <LINE>Be brave, then; for your captain is brave, and vows</LINE> <LINE>reformation. There shall be in England seven</LINE> <LINE>halfpenny loaves sold for a penny: the three-hooped</LINE> <LINE>pot shall have ten hoops and I will make it felony</LINE> <LINE>to drink small beer: all the realm shall be in</LINE> <LINE>common; and in Cheapside shall my palfrey go to</LINE> <LINE>grass: and when I am king, as king I will be,--</LINE> </SPEECH> <SPEECH> <SPEAKER>ALL</SPEAKER> <LINE>God save your majesty!</LINE> </SPEECH> <SPEECH> <SPEAKER>CADE</SPEAKER> <LINE>I thank you, good people: there shall be no money;</LINE> <LINE>all shall eat and drink on my score; and I will</LINE> <LINE>apparel them all in one livery, that they may agree</LINE> <LINE>like brothers and worship me their lord.</LINE> </SPEECH> <SPEECH> <SPEAKER>DICK</SPEAKER> <LINE>The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers.</LINE> </SPEECH> <SPEECH> <SPEAKER>CADE</SPEAKER> <LINE>Nay, that I mean to do. Is not this a lamentable</LINE> <LINE>thing, that of the skin of an innocent lamb should</LINE> <LINE>be made parchment? that parchment, being scribbled</LINE> <LINE>o'er, should undo a man? Some say the bee stings:</LINE> <LINE>but I say, 'tis the bee's wax; for I did but seal</LINE> <LINE>once to a thing, and I was never mine own man</LINE> <LINE>since. How now! who's there?</LINE> </SPEECH> <STAGEDIR>Enter some, bringing forward the Clerk of Chatham</STAGEDIR> <SPEECH> <SPEAKER>SMITH</SPEAKER> <LINE>The clerk of Chatham: he can write and read and</LINE> <LINE>cast accompt.</LINE> </SPEECH> <SPEECH> <SPEAKER>CADE</SPEAKER> <LINE>O monstrous!</LINE> </SPEECH> <SPEECH> <SPEAKER>SMITH</SPEAKER> <LINE>We took him setting of boys' copies.</LINE> </SPEECH> <SPEECH> <SPEAKER>CADE</SPEAKER> <LINE>Here's a villain!</LINE> </SPEECH> <SPEECH> <SPEAKER>SMITH</SPEAKER> <LINE>Has a book in his pocket with red letters in't.</LINE> </SPEECH> <SPEECH> <SPEAKER>CADE</SPEAKER> <LINE>Nay, then, he is a conjurer.</LINE> </SPEECH> Michael Kay > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Melton [mailto:jim.melton@acm.org] > Sent: 10 September 2003 20:22 > To: Tobias Reif > Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org > Subject: Re: string-length example > > > > While I am not a devotee of political correctness, I strive to not > gratuitously offend others. But saying that a famous, widely-known > quotation from arguably the most important writer in English > literature, is > so offensive that we have to avoid it is astonishing. (Note how I am > sincerely trying to avoid perjorative terms or attitudes!) > > I will also say that I personally know a couple of dozen > lawyers, including > members of my family. All of them know the quotation, none > of them are > offended by it, all of them use it in their own conversations > and jokes > with other lawyers and with clients, and none of them have > expressed the > slightest discomfort with it. So I find myself wondering why we are > debating whether to include a quotation that *might* be > offensive to some > uneducated lawyer, even though significant personal > experience demonstrates > that many --- probably most, perhaps nearly all --- lawyers > are not at all > offended by it. > > I don't think that anybody who has studied English literature > even in small > amounts believes that Shakespeare was actually proposing > killing anybody, > much less wholesale slaughter of an entire class of people. > The reason I > would not be inclined to quote David Duke or Adolf Hitler is > because their > statements are intended to hurt people directly and to foment > the physical > destruction of classes of people. That is, in my view of the > world, a very > different thing. > > Sigh... > Jim > > > > At 06:55 PM 9/9/2003 +0200 Tuesday, Tobias Reif wrote: > > >scott_boag@us.ibm.com wrote: > > >(I assume you would not quote David Duke or Hitler... > > > >Exactly. > >A sentence does not get any better just because it has been > written by > >a > >famous person. > > > >I still think that adding the source of the quote would improve the > >situation, but only slightly. > > > >Tobi > > > >-- > >http://www.pinkjuice.com/ > > ============================================================== > ========== > Jim Melton --- Editor of ISO/IEC 9075-* (SQL) Phone: > +1.801.942.0144 > Oracle Corporation Oracle Email: > mailto:jim.melton@oracle.com > 1930 Viscounti Drive > Standards email: mailto:jim.melton@acm.org > Sandy, UT 84093-1063 Personal email: mailto:jim@melton.name USA Fax : +1.801.942.3345 ======================================================================== = Facts are facts. However, any opinions expressed are the opinions = = only of myself and may or may not reflect the opinions of anybody = = else with whom I may or may not have discussed the issues at hand. = ========================================================================
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2003 10:31:24 UTC