> > So the above example would become: > > > > "parent::a/(following-sibling::* | preceding-sibling::*)//text()" > > > > Which in my opinion is logically much more concise... > > It could be that I am missing something, but I believe your > proposal is possible in XPath 2.0. Correct, this expression is valid in XPath 2.0. Michael KayReceived on Tuesday, 9 September 2003 18:06:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:56:49 UTC