- From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 13:37:31 -0800
- To: "David Carlisle" <davidc@nag.co.uk>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
David: Thanks for your comments. See inline. All the best, Ashok -----Original Message----- From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Carlisle Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 8:04 AM To: public-qt-comments@w3.org Subject: [F&O] C.5 isnot It isn't clear why body of the Xquery implementation of eg:distinct-nodes-stable does not just use the simple Xpath given on the line above rather than a for let where construct, [AM] The F&O taskforce wanted to illustrate two different approaches to solving the problem. The current construct uses "isnot" which has been dropped from the current draft of xquery/xpath. [AM] Fixed! David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 28 November 2003 16:37:35 UTC