- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 15:52:58 GMT
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
The description (possibly copied from C.2.1 eg:value-union) says " ...in an undefined order." However both the xslt and xquery implementations given preserve the input order. Either the phrase should be dropped or fn:unordered() should be used in the implementations. The equivalent comment in C.2.1 does not have this problem as there the implementations use fn:distinct-values() so do return things in an an implementation dependent (rather than undefined) order. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 17 November 2003 10:56:59 UTC