- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:02:37 -0500
- To: Stephen Buxton <stephen.buxton@oracle.com>
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
/ Stephen Buxton <stephen.buxton@oracle.com> was heard to say:
| *Data Model, Section 4.1.6 typed-value Accessor*
|
| Should the return type for a namespace node be xs:uri rather than
| xdt:untypedAtomic ?
The WG decided to leave it xdt:untypedAtomic. The F&O
functions that deal with URIs all expect strings, so using
xdt:untypedAtomic allows them to be used more easily with those
functions.
Be seeing you,
norm
- --
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQE/skuNOyltUcwYWjsRAkCPAKCQPqhkvOk8PE4rik9ugek7SdWrgwCgnDa2
XPIy+KxnNfPbDPGLyjn3ngA=
=4c4r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2003 20:19:32 UTC