- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 09:59:49 -0500
- To: Stephen Buxton <stephen.buxton@oracle.com>
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 / Stephen Buxton <stephen.buxton@oracle.com> was heard to say: | *Data Model, Section 4.3.1 Overview* | | Point 9 says that attributes are not children of their parents. | Shouldn't this also say that namespaces are not children of their parents? | | More generally, the use of "parent" for what the Infoset calls "owner | element" is probably a mistake. | It is unduly confusing to say that something is not a child of its parent ! I've updated the draft to note that namespaces are not children either. The parent:: axis operates consistently with the definitions used in this document. It may be confusing to speak of the parent of an attribute when the infoset calls that the owner, but there his historical precedent in XPath 1.0 for doing so. It is also, in its own way, more consistent. Be seeing you, norm - -- Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc. NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQE/skrkOyltUcwYWjsRAr1KAJ0aAzJqEhXBWiNzWbt3m07GSJ4FOQCfeXuk jYsrtFwmNiDxc0E95vS8gjo= =nnWT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2003 20:19:22 UTC