- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 09:52:27 -0500
- To: Stephen Buxton <stephen.buxton@oracle.com>
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
/ Stephen Buxton <stephen.buxton@oracle.com> was heard to say:
| *Data Model, Section 5. Atomic values*
| The bullets in the middle of this section would be better expressed in
| the singular,
| eg, "The value of a node whose type is an XML Schema primitive type
| ... is represented as an atomic value of that type".
| In general, when you have implicit universal quantification, it is a
| better practice to use the singular because it avoids ambiguity.
Agreed. I have attempted to fix these problems in the 12 Nov draft.
Be seeing you,
norm
- --
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQE/skkrOyltUcwYWjsRAvOrAJ9DzWdJkC7DXRRkCbDB7SIgPPlhWQCfXkbM
29WbXmxp+WVSQ2yJB4Pf4pE=
=qEqz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2003 20:18:59 UTC