- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 09:48:40 -0500
- To: Stephen Buxton <stephen.buxton@oracle.com>
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
/ Stephen Buxton <stephen.buxton@oracle.com> was heard to say:
| *Data Model, Section 4.1.1 base-uri Accessor*
| third para: "If the base URI property ... is non-empty"
| The Infoset recommendation does not have a notion of a property being
| "empty" or "non-empty".
| It does have the notion of a property being "unknown" or "no value".
| The Infoset recommendation says that "unknown" and "no value" are
| different values, but it does not indicate whether the value of a
| [base URI] property may be either these values or just one of them.
| Anyway, you probably mean these values when you say "empty".
|
| Does "empty" mean "unknown" or "no value" ?
| If so, it may be better to use the terminology in the Infoset
| recommendation.
This section of the document has been extensively redrafted.
I believe your comments have been addressed in the 12 Nov draft.
Be seeing you,
norm
- --
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQE/skhIOyltUcwYWjsRAsMJAJ9SwKIgQq6wQCHVJpxNvDzyx3OZ7wCfXBm7
Q8hJTNy23H6OYDNl1cmohz4=
=I4Vo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2003 20:18:36 UTC