- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 09:46:36 -0500
- To: Stephen Buxton <stephen.buxton@oracle.com>
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 / Stephen Buxton <stephen.buxton@oracle.com> was heard to say: | *Data Model, Section 3.2 Document order* | The first paragraph says that a document order is total. | The last two paragraphs broaden the discussion to include order | between nodes in different documents, or not in a document at all. | Is it intended that the ordering in the latter two paragraphs is | total? Or could a conforming implementation simply say, "I choose not | to define an ordering between nodes in different documents, or between | nodes not in any document. My ordering of these things is the trivial | ordering, the one which such things simply have no ordering."? | | Put another way, is there anything that breaks if an implementation is | not able to place a collection of free-standing nodes into a stable | order? This section has been redrafted to make this clearer in the 12 Nov spec. Be seeing you, norm - -- Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc. NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQE/skfMOyltUcwYWjsRAseyAJ491ZXqj1S1ejs9iwgvhA31HS9q8wCffOnv zqgRk5JIKBnnsv8WYzSrZ44= =PoxX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2003 20:18:28 UTC