Re: ORA-DM-ANON-NAME

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ Stephen Buxton <stephen.buxton@oracle.com> was heard to say:
| *Data Model, Section 3.4*
| What is the namespace for an anonymous type name ?
| Can it be the result of an expression ?
| Does it need to come from a schema ?
| What is legal in an anonymous type name ?
|
| Michael Rys addressed this question in
|
| http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003May/0305.html
| <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003May/0291.html>
| by saying that "Since the name is not exposed and thus the format used
| by an implementation not testable, any such definition would be
| vacuous and not testable or enforceable."
|
| So, is it the Working Groups position that there are no rules at all
| governing anonymous type names ? If so, please add text to that effect.

I believe the 12 Nov spec is explicit on that point.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE/skYcOyltUcwYWjsRAkrUAJ45ksHhTriZb6z8OHkHC8HBHvaf9ACfbq5w
iiN+gGDiPvp2JRAeZhqET+I=
=5dtw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Thursday, 13 November 2003 20:18:10 UTC