- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 09:27:07 -0500
- To: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 / Per Bothner <per@bothner.com> was heard to say: | DM 4.5.2 and G.4 say that dm:parent of a namespace node | is "the parent element node". It does not define | what this means. | | However, none of the namespace nodes in D Example | show a value for dm:parent, though dm:parent is | shown for other nodes. | | Should there be a constraint in 4.3.1 and/or 4.5.1 that | is a namespace node has a parent, then it should be among | the namespace of its parent? The converse constraint would | prohibit sharing of namespace nodes, as in D example. | The issue should at least be mentioned. | | One solution is to just define dm:parent of a namespace as (). I've clarified the 12 Nov spec and added a note to the example to explain the lack of parents on the namespace nodes. Be seeing you, norm - -- Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc. NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQE/skM7OyltUcwYWjsRAh3HAJ0dG1s9jIKdCRTIoVTiMCSZw1KaogCfWQgi 0/7M/wmK4QWv0lBUi9Ck05M= =gNjT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2003 20:17:21 UTC