- From: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 12:13:38 -0800
- To: "Xavier Franc" <xfranc@online.fr>
- Cc: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
The WGs members were split on whether we should make these changes so we asked Michael Kay to provide a detailed proposal (which he has done) and the next WD will request specific publicfeedback on whether the public likes the current design or the design as proposed by Michael. While I agree with your position that making a decision on this matter would have been useful, I also think getting public feedback on the choice is also a good idea. /paulc Chair, XML Query WG Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com > -----Original Message----- > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Xavier Franc > Sent: November 6, 2003 5:16 PM > To: public-qt-comments@w3.org > Subject: Re: Nmeric durations > > > > At the risk to look annoying, I want to say it is a pity > to postpone resolution of this issue to a later draft. > > It is in general a good design principle to solve the main problems first; > and these date/duration functions are probably the most prominent issue > in the current F&O specifications. > > > > As, I think you know, the WGs decided to postpone discussion of these > items until after the > > F&O document was published on November 14, 2003. > > -- > Xavier FRANC
Received on Monday, 10 November 2003 15:13:39 UTC