- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 09:51:14 -0500
- To: Svgdeveloper@aol.com
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The statement in 4.1.4 (now in the introduction) is a definition. That's what "document" means in this specification. I renamed the section title in 4.2 (now 7.1) and the other corresponding sections to remove the ambiguity you note. As to whether documents have the properties ascribed or not, I think they do: they're part of what makes a document a document. In any event, the spec has been extensively redrafted and I believe that these points are now clearer. Please let me know if you disagree. / Svgdeveloper@aol.com was heard to say: | I am concerned at the use of the word "document" in the Data Model document. | | The term "document" seems to be used for at least three purposes, as far as I | can see. | | In 4.1.4 we read, "A tree whose root node is a document node is a document". | Well, no it isn't, not really. | | It seems to me that some distinct term ... "document tree"? ... should be | used where the sense of 4.1.4 is intended, to avoid confusion with XML | documents and with document nodes. | | In 4.2 we find a heading "Documents" which I think is an informal shorthand | for document nodes. Or is the 4.1.4 "document tree" sense intended in parts? | | In 4.2, we have ".... XML documents. Documents have the following properties | ....". I assume that by "Documents" it is intended to refer to "document | nodes"? XML documents qua XML documents certainly don't have the stated | properties. | | It is disappointing to see these ambiguities persisting in the Data Model | document. I seem to recall raising this issue some time ago. In a formal | specification document I think it ought to be tidier and that a greater level | of precision and consistency should be aimed for and achieved. Not least when | the specification is deemed to be in Last Call. | | Andrew Watt Be seeing you, norm - -- Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc. NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQE/qQ5hOyltUcwYWjsRAtxdAJ9E4yp+YjkHMYumk+bgq9/ERQnXywCeN4eT dtNIup6pRBIW6OmjWqVtrzc= =/Jpu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2003 09:51:34 UTC