- From: Kay, Michael <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 16:48:58 +0100
- To: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>, "Kay, Michael" <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>, Noe Michejda <noe_michejda@7thportal.pl>, public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <DFF2AC9E3583D511A21F0008C7E62106073DD261@daemsg02.software-ag.de>
Given two functions declare function f($x as X, $y as Y) {...}; declare function f($x as X) { ... }; and two function calls f(1,2) f(1) I don't see how we could ever come up with any different resolution of these function calls than binding the first call to the first declaration and the second to the second. I don't think this argument holds water. Michael Kay -----Original Message----- From: Michael Rys [mailto:mrys@microsoft.com] Sent: 04 November 2003 00:05 To: Kay, Michael; Noe Michejda; public-qt-comments@w3.org Subject: RE: Overloading functions in XSLT and XQuery The reason is that the current built-in overloading with arity should continue to work if we go to overloading based on the full signature information. Once we allow the users to overload, I am concerned that we get cases where overloading with arity will result in a different resolution than overloading based on the typed signature. So instead of having to deal with this in (for XQuery) the first version, we wanted to postpone this feature. Best regards Michael (speaking for himself) _____ From: Kay, Michael [mailto:Michael.Kay@softwareag.com] Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 8:17 AM To: Noe Michejda; Michael Rys; public-qt-comments@w3.org Subject: RE: Overloading functions in XSLT and XQuery > > RE: Overloading functions in XSLT and XQuery> XQuery 1.0 > decided to only allow overloading of XQuery's own built-in > functions and not provide overloading > > capabilities for the user-defined functions. > > This explains the perceived contradiction below. > > But XSLT allows overloaded user-defined functions. > This will be very inconvinient for products allowing using of > XSLT libraries in XQuery. And to some degree event for people > porting libraries from XSLT to XQuery. > Personally, I agree. I can't see any logical objection to overloading by arity (two functions with the same name but different numbers of arguments). I think it's very odd that the function calling mechanism in XQuery allows for it, but that user-defined functions have to be uniquely named. Michael Kay
Received on Tuesday, 4 November 2003 10:50:11 UTC