- From: Kay, Michael <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 01:39:18 +0100
- To: Gareth Reakes <gareth@decisionsoft.com>, Svgdeveloper@aol.com
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> if the context node was a element node who had mixed > content then > there could be multiple text nodes. Correct. Or even if the context node had simple content, but contained a comment: <ele>123<!--decimal point follows-->.456</ele> Michael Kay > > eg > > > <ele>text > <in1>text > </ele> > > Gareth > > > On Tue, 4 Mar 2003 Svgdeveloper@aol.com wrote: > > > > > For the following examples in 3.2.3 and 3.2.4, > > > > child::text() > > text() > > > > the corresponding definition refers to *all* child text > nodes of the > > context > > node. > > > > Isn't it the case that there can only ever be one such text > node which > > is a > > child node of the context node? The term "all", therefore, > seems potentially > > misleading. > > > > Andrew Watt > > > > > > -- > Gareth Reakes, Head of Product Development +44-1865-203192 > DecisionSoft Limited > http://www.decisionsoft.com > XML Development and Services > > >
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2003 19:39:27 UTC