- From: Stephen Buxton <stephen.buxton@oracle.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:01:32 -0700
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2003 01:01:42 UTC
*Data Model, Section 3.2 Document order* The definition defines "document order" for all nodes in a document, but the same notion of order is intended to apply to all trees, including fragments. This is seen, for example, in section 4.1.8 "children Accessor", where it says that "For document and element nodes, it returns the nodes that are children of that node in document order". An element in a fragment needs to have its children ordered, but the definition of "document order" does not currently cover this case since "document order" only applies to documents. One solution would be to change the term from "document order" to "tree order". However, the term "document order" seems pretty well entrenched, so perhaps a better solution is to keep the term but make it apply to all trees, not just documents.
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2003 01:01:42 UTC