- From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 16:40:38 -0700
- To: "Stephen Buxton" <stephen.buxton@oracle.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2003 19:43:32 UTC
Since the node represents the document information item and we call it document in the type system it is probably better to call it document node. "Root node" is often interpreted as the top-level element node in a document and thus not a good choice. Best regards Michael ________________________________ From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Buxton Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 16:19 PM To: public-qt-comments@w3.org Subject: ORA-DM-ROOT-DOCUMENT Data Model, Section 4.2.1 says "Document nodes and XPath 1.0 root nodes are essentially identical." If these terms are identical, why invent another term ? If they are not identical, it would be good to have some indication of the differences here. And if we must have another term, why call it a "document node" ? This will naturally be confused with the "document element", which in XPath 1.0 is the child of the root node.
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2003 19:43:32 UTC