- From: Stephen Buxton <stephen.buxton@oracle.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 16:36:23 -0700
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2003 19:36:36 UTC
*Data Model, Section 3.4* What is the namespace for an anonymous type name ? Can it be the result of an expression ? Does it need to come from a schema ? What is legal in an anonymous type name ? Michael Rys addressed this question in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003May/0305.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003May/0291.html> by saying that "Since the name is not exposed and thus the format used by an implementation not testable, any such definition would be vacuous and not testable or enforceable." So, is it the Working Groups position that there are no rules at all governing anonymous type names ? If so, please add text to that effect.
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2003 19:36:36 UTC