- From: Stephen Buxton <stephen.buxton@oracle.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:39:41 -0700
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <3EF8D32D.4090802@oracle.com>
*Data Model, Section 4. Nodes. *It seems that a node is similar to, but not exactly the same as, an information item, as found in the Infoset recommendation and enhanced with the PSV contributions in the XML Schema Part 1 recommendation. It would be helpful to say this explicitly, especially since you share the term "property" with the Infoset, so it is easy to form the impression that a node is simply an information item. The reader who starts with this impression is then left wondering where the properties not found in the Infoset came from (for example, the document-uri property of the document node). In addition, it would be helpful to specify your general conventions for nodes here at the beginning. For example, each node consists of a list of named properties. In the Infoset, a property may be "unknown" or "no value", but in this specification, those values are not used, and instead you say a property may be "empty", even if it is not a collection. Suggestion: The Data Model document might be well advised to include an appendix describing the relationships between Data Model properties and the Infoset information items and the PSVI, just as the XPath 1.0 spec did for its data model (We are aware of the Processing Model work and its relationship to this comment).
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2003 18:39:54 UTC