- From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 02:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
- To: "Kay, Michael" <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>, public-qt-comments@w3.org
> > Suggested solution: > > Replace the above excerpt with: > > > > "If either node has attributes, and if either node has > > an attribute > > that is not deep-equal to any attribute of the other > > node, using > > the selected collation, then the result is false." > > > > Dimitre Novatchev. > > > > Actually I think your reformulation suffers the same ambiguity as the > original: it's not clear whether it means "A has an attribute that is (not > deep-equal) to some attribute of B" or "A has an attribute that is not > (deep-equal to some attribute of B)". > > I think we need to get pedantic: > > "If either node has attributes, and if either node has an attribute A such > that the other node does not have an attribute that is deep-equal to A, > using the selected collation, then the result is false." > > The initial "If either node has attributes, and" is of course redundant. Thank you. This is what I really meant. Dimitre Novatchev. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2003 05:46:36 UTC