- From: Dimitre Novatchev <silvan@teleweb.at>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 19:43:25 +0200
- To: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Functions and operations on sequences, 15.1, zero-or-one, one-or-more, exactly-one Class: Editorial, Technical Section 15.1 Functions and Operators on Sequences defines the functions zero-or-one, one-or-more, exactly-one. The names describe properties and suggest that these functions return boolean result. However, this is not the case. The function definitions are: fn:zero-or-one($srcval as item*) as item? fn:one-or-more($srcval as item*) as item+ fn:exactly-one($srcval as item*) as item Another issue with this function is that their main purpose seems to be in raising an error message if the property they name is not true for the parameter-sequence. Such functions seem strange and their necessity and potential usage must be explained in detail. A third issue is that the description for all three functions contains the sentence: “The type of the result is the type of $srcval.” This is clearly contradicted by the definitions of the functions – item* is not the same as item?, item+ or item. Suggested solution: 1. Change the names to more precisely reflect the meaning of the functions, e.g: constraint-zero-or-one, etc. 2. Note and explain the very special behaviour of these functions and its potential usefulness. 3. Correct the description and/or the definition of the functions so that they would not contradict each other. Dimitre Novatchev.
Received on Monday, 23 June 2003 13:28:23 UTC