- From: <xquery@attbi.com>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 22:21:25 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
In the May 2 language draft, in the definition of typeswitch (3.12.2, paragraph 4), the explanation of variable types does not make sense for the default clause: "Within the return expression of the case or default clause, this variable name is bound to the value of the operand expression, and its static type is considered to be the SequenceType named in the case or default clause." But, the default clause has no sequence type.
Received on Sunday, 8 June 2003 18:21:31 UTC