- From: Kay, Michael <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 19:50:44 +0200
- To: Stephen Buxton <stephen.buxton@oracle.com>, public-qt-comments@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2003 13:51:00 UTC
Yes, this is an odd curiosity. It would be much more logical if the function took a node as an argument and defaulted to the context node. The only reason we haven't done this, I suspect, is that of all the 27 functions in XPath 1.0 this one is probably by far the least often used. Michael Kay -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Buxton [mailto:stephen.buxton@oracle.com] Sent: 01 July 2003 03:47 To: public-qt-comments@w3.org Subject: ORA-FO-LANG-ANYNODE 14.1.5 fn:lang Functions and Operators, Section 14.1.5 fn:lang <fn:lang> Why is this function only defined on the context node ? It may be useful to pass in any node.
Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2003 13:51:00 UTC