- From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 08:31:49 -0500
- To: Svgdeveloper@aol.com, Michael.Kay@softwareag.com, public-qt-comments@w3.org
At 03:16 AM 2/18/2003 -0500, Svgdeveloper@aol.com wrote: >In my (casual?) approach the unqualified term "XPath" refers to XPath 1.0. >In the WG's casual approach is something different intended by the >unqualified term XPath? Presumably it is. > >Am I correct in assuming that the full-text search material does *not*, >for example, apply to XPath 1.0 and is not usable with XPath 1.0? Should >that not be made clearer? XPath 1.0 is already published. It can't be changed. It does not include full text search. XPath 2.0 will probably be published well before full text search is added. Jonathan
Received on Tuesday, 18 February 2003 08:32:25 UTC