Re: base-uri clarification

Kay, Michael wrote:
> Since functions in F&O aren't supposed to access data model properties
> except via data-model accessors this is clearly NOT correct - thanks for
> pointing it out.
> 
> I suspect that the F&O description should be changed to say it maps to the
> DM base-uri accessor, rather than to the DM base-uri property.

Note that the "accessors" tables in the data model spec (for example
in section 4.8.3 in the November draft) say that the base-uri of
text (for example) is ().

The table for dm:base-uri for Processing-intruction also lists (),
but eariler it states  "Document, element, and processing-instruction
nodes have a base-uri property."

So some work is needed to make it all consistent.
-- 
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://www.bothner.com/per/

Received on Saturday, 15 February 2003 15:57:02 UTC