Your comment on the F&O

I'm having trouble figuring out how to respond to your comment below
from
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Jul/0105.html

Could you please provide some guidance?

> [38] *** 7.3 "For alignment with the [Character Model for the World
Wide
> Web 1.0], applications may choose collations that treat unnormalized
> strings as though they were normalized (that is, that implicitly
normalize
> the strings)."
>      This is somewhat misleading, in that early uniform normalization
>      should avoid having to compare strings that differ only in
> normalization.
>      This should be reworded carefully. Please also point out that
using
>      highest collation strength does not imply string normalization.


All the best, Ashok