I'm having trouble figuring out how to respond to your comment below from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Jul/0105.html Could you please provide some guidance? > [38] *** 7.3 "For alignment with the [Character Model for the World Wide > Web 1.0], applications may choose collations that treat unnormalized > strings as though they were normalized (that is, that implicitly normalize > the strings)." > This is somewhat misleading, in that early uniform normalization > should avoid having to compare strings that differ only in > normalization. > This should be reworded carefully. Please also point out that using > highest collation strength does not imply string normalization. All the best, AshokReceived on Tuesday, 26 August 2003 08:02:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:56:49 UTC