RE: MS-FO-LC1-093: fn:item-at from Ashok Malhotra on 2003-08-11 (public-qt-comments@w3.org from August 2003)

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 07:35:49 -0700
To: "Michael Rys" <mrys@microsoft.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <E5B814702B65CB4DA51644580E4853FB0A28E596@red-msg-12.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

Michael:
As you may remember we discussed the removal of this function at the F&O
meeting in Redmond on 7/18 and the F&O taskforce decided not to
recommend its removal.

All the best, Ashok

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael Rys
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 11:58 AM
> To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: MS-FO-LC1-093: fn:item-at
> 
> 
> Class: Editorial
> 
> Section 15.1.6: We already have the [] notation for indexing
sequences.
> This function is not needed except for defining the semantics of
> [position()=x] (at most). In that case, move this into the formal
> semantics as a function belonging to fs: pseudo-namespace.
>

Received on Monday, 11 August 2003 10:35:57 UTC