- From: Kay, Michael <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 19:31:46 +0200
- To: Svgdeveloper@aol.com, Michael.Kay@softwareag.com
- Cc: xml-names-editor@w3.org, public-qt-comments@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
- Message-ID: <DFF2AC9E3583D511A21F0008C7E62106073DD02A@daemsg02.software-ag.de>
I don't think there is an inconsistency. XSLT 1.0 and XPath 1.0 use namespaces to qualify variable names and function names. We can't change that, so there is little point arguing about whether or not it was a good idea. Michael Kay -----Original Message----- From: Svgdeveloper@aol.com [mailto:Svgdeveloper@aol.com] Sent: 04 August 2003 16:36 To: Michael.Kay@softwareag.com Cc: xml-names-editor@w3.org; public-qt-comments@w3.org; www-tag@w3.org Subject: Re: Inappropriate use of XML Namespaces in XQuery, XPath 2.0 and XSLT 2.0? In a message dated 04/08/2003 13:53:30 GMT Daylight Time, Michael.Kay@softwareag.com writes: This extended use of XML namespaces was first introduced in XSLT 1.0. You may not like it, but it works, and it's too late to change it. Which aspect(s) of the inconsistency underlying the problem are you suggesting are immutable? Andrew Watt Michael Kay -----Original Message----- From: Svgdeveloper@aol.com [mailto:Svgdeveloper@aol.com] Sent: 02 August 2003 09:11 To: xml-names-editor@w3.org; public-qt-comments@w3.org Subject: Inappropriate use of XML Namespaces in XQuery, XPath 2.0 and XSLT 2.0? In the various draft XQuery, XPath 2.0 and XSLT 2.0 documents it is indicated that datatypes and functions are contained in designated XML namespaces. A similar seeming error made in W3C XML Schema is also carried forward into the XQuery/XPath/XSLT2 documents. This seems to me to be in conflict with the Namespaces in XML 1.0 Recommendation which defines an XML namespace as applying to element type names and attribute names. There is no provision that I can see in the Namespaces in XML Rec for datatype or function names being part of an "XML namespace". Correcting this seeming discrepancy should be straightforward but it seems to me that it needs to be tidied. Andrew Watt
Received on Monday, 4 August 2003 13:31:53 UTC